State v. Brown

35 P.3d 910 (2001)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...

State v. Brown

Kansas Supreme Court

35 P.3d 910 (2001)

Play video

Facts

Susan Brown (defendant) made arrangements for Teresa Lawrence, one of Brown’s employees, to purchase the baby of Samantha Pruitt, a former employee. With Brown’s assistance, an agreement was reached under which Pruitt would give her baby to Lawrence in exchange for a new car, a cell phone, and $800. Under the terms of the agreement, Brown was to receive half of the money, or $400, as compensation for Brown’s role in facilitating the agreement. Pruitt transferred the baby to Lawrence, but the compensation due under the agreement was not immediately paid. Before the payment took place, Brown was convicted under a Kansas statute that made it a felony to knowingly and intentionally receive or accept clearly excessive fees in connection with an adoption. Brown appealed, arguing that because the payment had not been made, Brown had not yet received or accepted the $400 and thus had not yet violated the Kansas statute.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McFarland, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 36,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership