State v. Davis
Hawaii Supreme Court
140 Haw. 252 (2017)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Raymond Davis (defendant) was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated. At Davis’s trial, the State of Hawaii (plaintiff) introduced into evidence a machine operator’s sworn out-of-court statement that the Intoxilyzer machine used to test Davis’s breath-alcohol content was working properly. The state used the statement to establish that the results of Davis’s breath-alcohol test were reliable. The state sought to admit the statement under both the public-records exception and the business-records exception to the hearsay rule. The trial court admitted the statement under the public-records exception. Davis was convicted, and the appellate court affirmed the conviction. Davis appealed to the Hawaii Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pollack, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.