State v. Hocter
Montana Supreme Court
262 P.3d 1089 (2011)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Alicia Hocter (defendant) was taking care of her boyfriend’s baby daughter while the boyfriend was away. Hocter had been involved in the baby’s life since the baby’s birth and claimed to love the child no differently than she would her own. However, Hocter assaulted the child because the baby was colicky and would not stop crying. Hocter then left the crying and injured child in the crib and turned up the music. Due to her injuries, the child was left permanently disabled and blind. Hocter was charged with child endangerment for failing to obtain medical care for the child. Hocter was convicted of child endangerment by omission and appealed the case to the Montana Supreme Court, arguing that she did not have a duty to care for the child.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McGrath, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.