State v. Schumann
Ghana Court of Appeal
39 ILR 433 (1966)
Schumann (defendant) was involved in the murders of more than 30,000 individuals in mental institutions and concentration camps during World War II. Schumann fled to Ghana after the war, where he was eventually arrested. Germany requested Ghana to extradite Schumann to Germany on murder charges. Schumann applied for a writ of habeas corpus to the High Court of Ghana, arguing that Schumann’s offenses were political in nature and that he could not be extradited under the Extradition Act of 1960. Specifically, Schumann claimed that he was only following Hitler’s orders when he aided in the murders and that his acts were not illegal in Germany during World War II. The High Court dismissed Schumann’s application, and Schumann appealed to the Ghana Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Akufo-Addo, C.J.)
Concurrence (Crabbe, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.