Summers v. Tice
Supreme Court of California
199 P.2d 1, 33 Cal.2d 80 (1948)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Summers (plaintiff), Tice (defendant), and Simonson (defendant) went quail hunting. Summers instructed both Tice and Simonson to use care when shooting. Summers walked in front of both men in the field. Tice flushed a quail out of the bushes and both he and Simonson shot at the quail in the direction of Summers. They were using birdshot. One pellet hit Summers’ eye and one hit his lip. It is unknown which pellet was shot by which man. Summers brought suit for negligence against both Tice and Simonson. The trial court entered judgment for Summers against both Tice and Simonson, and the defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.