From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Sure-Trip, Inc. v. Westinghouse Engineering
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
47 F.3d 526 (1996)
Westinghouse Engineering (Westinghouse) (defendant) had a contract with Sure-Trip, Inc. (Sure-Trip) (plaintiff) to purchase 1200 retrofit kits in 1988. At the end of 1988, Westinghouse had bought only 75 kits from Sure-Trip. Sure-Trip sued Westinghouse for lost profits under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 2-708. At trial, Sure-Trip alleged that it would have made a $530 profit on each of the 1125 units that Westinghouse failed to buy. Sure-Trip calculated this alleged lost-profit amount by taking the kit price in the Westinghouse contract and subtracting Sure-Trip’s costs for material, labor, and packaging for each kit. Sure-Trip based its cost figures on the 621 units it had sold in 1988. The trial court asked Sure-Trip to submit evidence regarding how its variable expenses would have increased if Sure-Trip had ramped up production to manufacture an additional 1125 units in one year. Sure-Trip claimed that none of its expenses would have increased with a larger production volume. However, Sure-Trip’s 1988 tax return showed Sure-Trip’s income as just $12,000, with deductions for rent, advertising, travel, office supplies, insurance, legal expenses, and contracting fees. Westinghouse argued that Sure-Trip’s lost profits should be calculated at $12,000 divided by the 621 units sold, or just over $19 per kit. The trial court found that Westinghouse had breached the contract. However, the trial court rejected Sure-Trip’s assertion that its variable costs would not increase if it had more than doubled its kit production for the year, and held that Sure-Trip’s lost profits should be calculated at just $19 per kit, for a total of $21,656. Sure-Trip appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cardamone, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.