Sweeny Co. v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
109 F.R.D. 358 (1986)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Sweeny Co. (plaintiff), a subcontractor, sued Engineers-Constructors, Inc. (ECI) (defendant) in a federal court in Virginia. The complaint alleged contract claims as well as fraud. The basis of Sweeny’s fraud claim was that in the “spring or summer of 1985,” certain “agents and employees” of ECI represented to Sweeny that it would be paid in full for its work when, in actuality, ECI had previously developed a “scheme or device” to wrongfully terminate the subcontract and not pay Sweeny. When ECI moved to dismiss Sweeny’s fraud claim for lack of particularity, Sweeny amended its complaint. The fraud claim in the amended complaint was essentially unchanged, however. ECI again moved to dismiss the fraud claim. The court considered ECI’s motion, to which Sweeny did not respond.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Warriner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.