Sweeny Co. v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
109 F.R.D. 358 (1986)
Sweeny Co. (plaintiff), a subcontractor, sued Engineers-Constructors, Inc. (ECI) (defendant) in a federal court in Virginia. The complaint alleged contract claims as well as fraud. The basis of Sweeny’s fraud claim was that in the “spring or summer of 1985,” certain “agents and employees” of ECI represented to Sweeny that it would be paid in full for its work when, in actuality, ECI had previously developed a “scheme or device” to wrongfully terminate the subcontract and not pay Sweeny. When ECI moved to dismiss Sweeny’s fraud claim for lack of particularity, Sweeny amended its complaint. The fraud claim in the amended complaint was essentially unchanged, however. ECI again moved to dismiss the fraud claim. The court considered ECI’s motion, to which Sweeny did not respond.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Warriner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.