Taake v. Taake

70 Wis. 2d 115, 233 N.W.2d 449 (1975)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Taake v. Taake

Wisconsin Supreme Court
70 Wis. 2d 115, 233 N.W.2d 449 (1975)

Facts

E. Robert Taake (plaintiff) obtained a divorce from Barbara Taake (defendant) on the ground of cruel and inhumane treatment. Barbara was awarded monthly alimony of $200. Later, Barbara met Lyle Fink. Barbara and Fink lived together in Barbara’s apartment for a few weeks before they moved into a home newly purchased by Fink. Barbara and Fink apparently agreed that she would pay him $25 per month in rent, pay for some of the groceries, and perform some housework. Although Barbara had a separate bedroom, she and Fink occasionally engaged in sexual relations. Barbara also allowed others to acknowledge her as Mrs. Fink without correcting them, although she took no steps to formally identify herself as Fink’s wife. Robert stopped making alimony payments and petitioned the court to terminate the obligation. At this point, both Barbara and Fink were unemployed. The court found that Barbara and Fink had entered a de facto marriage. The ensuing judgment expunged Robert’s alimony arrearages, terminated the alimony award, and barred Barbara from future alimony from Robert. Barbara appealed. The Wisconsin Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beilfuss, J.)

Dissent (Heffernan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership