From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...
Taggart v. Taggart
Texas Supreme Court
552 S.W.2d 422 (1977)
George Taggart (defendant) joined the U.S. Navy in 1943 and married Ann Taggart (plaintiff) in 1947. In 1964, after 20 years of service in the regular Navy, George transferred to a reserve unit. In 1968 George and Ann divorced in proceedings that made no mention of George’s forthcoming military-retirement benefits. By 1974, George had completed 30 years of active duty, making him eligible for retirement benefits. Ann brought suit for her share of those benefits. The trial court awarded Ann a one-half interest in George’s retirement benefits on the basis of George’s 20 years in the regular Navy. The court of appeals reversed, holding that Ann was not entitled to any share of George’s benefits. Ann appealed. The Texas Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Pope, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.