Texas v. New Mexico

462 U.S. 554 (1983)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Texas v. New Mexico

United States Supreme Court
462 U.S. 554 (1983)

Facts

In 1947, the states of Texas and New Mexico entered into a compact to apportion water rights relating to the Pecos River. The Pecos River originates in New Mexico and flows into Texas. The compact required New Mexico to ensure that a certain amount of water flowed through to Texas and also set up a three-person commission to resolve disputes. Each state had a voting representative, and the third representative (the US commissioner), acting on behalf of the federal government, did not have a vote. Congress consented to the compact in 1948 as required by the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution. A dispute arose regarding a shortfall in the water flowing from New Mexico to Texas. The New Mexico and Texas voting representatives could not agree. The United States Supreme Court invoked original jurisdiction under Article III of the United States Constitution and 28 U.S.C. § 1251. A court-appointed special master suggested that the court give the US commissioner a tie-breaking vote.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership