Thompson v. Kaczinski
Iowa Supreme Court
774 N.W.2d 829 (2009)
James Kaczinski and Michelle Lockwood lived on property next to a road. They placed a disassembled trampoline in their yard, less than forty feet from the road, for later disposal. Wind blew the top of the trampoline onto the road. Charles Thompson, who was later driving on the road, swerved to avoid the trampoline top and was injured when his car rolled into a ditch. Thompson (plaintiff) sued Kaczinski and Lockwood (defendants), arguing that they breached a common law duty by negligently allowing the trampoline to obstruct the road. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Kaczinski and Lockwood, finding that they owed no duty to Thompson because the risk of the trampoline obstructing the road was not foreseeable, and that their alleged negligence was not the proximate cause of Thompson’s injuries. The court of appeals affirmed. Thompson appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.