Tisdale v. Federal Express Corp.

415 F.3d 516 (2005)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tisdale v. Federal Express Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
415 F.3d 516 (2005)

Facts

Richard Tisdale (plaintiff) worked for Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) (defendant) at FedEx’s Nashville distribution center, known as BNART. Over four years, Tisdale expressed concerns about Black BNART employees like himself being treated unfavorably. Several complaints were made to Tim Stuthard, BNART’s operation manager and Tisdale’s supervisor. On February 3, 2000, FedEx district manager Frances Miller visited BNART, holding a meeting with all employees. Tisdale again expressed concern about BNART’s treatment of Black employees. Miller advised Tisdale to put his concerns in writing. On February 13, a letter co-authored by Tisdale and signed by 18 BNART employees was sent to Miller. However, on February 11, Tisdale had been suspended for allegedly stealing FedEx property. He was subsequently terminated by Stuthard. Tisdale sued FedEx under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), alleging that his termination constituted unlawful retaliation for reporting racial discrimination. The jury held in Tisdale’s favor and awarded him $15,000 in backpay and $100,000 in punitive damages. FedEx appealed the punitive-damages award, arguing that even if Stuthard and Miller engaged in retaliatory conduct, FedEx was not vicariously liable for punitive damages because (1) Stuthard and Miller were merely mid-level managers and (2) any retaliatory conduct was contrary to FedEx’s written antidiscrimination policy.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 916,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership