Todd v. Exxon Corporation

275 F.3d 191 (2001)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
T
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Todd v. Exxon Corporation

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
275 F.3d 191 (2001)

Play video

Facts

Exxon Corporation (Exxon) and 13 other oil companies (defendants) made up 80 to 90 percent of the oil and petrochemical industry. These defendants shared salary information with each other using various types of surveys and meetings. The salary information was compiled, analyzed, and disseminated by Towers Perrin, a third-party consultant. The defendants then used the information to set salaries for managerial, professional, and technical (MPT) employees. Roberta Todd sued on behalf of a class of Exxon employees (plaintiffs), alleging an unlawful information exchange in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The plaintiffs argued that the defendants’ information exchange artificially depressed MPT salaries. The district court found that the plaintiffs failed to allege several necessary elements and dismissed the claim. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sotomayor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Antitrust
Employment Law

Key Terms