Todd v. Ortho Biotech, Incorporated

175 F.3d 595 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Todd v. Ortho Biotech, Incorporated

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
175 F.3d 595 (1999)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

Lori Todd (plaintiff) was formerly employed by Ortho Biotech, Inc. (Ortho) (defendant) as a sales representative. Todd was sexually assaulted by James Moreland, Ortho’s Director of Trade Relation, during a national sales meeting in Boston in 1992. Todd sued Ortho, alleging that Moreland’s assault constituted a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and sexual harassment under the Minnesota Human Rights Act. The trial court found Ortho liable under Title VII, and Ortho appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed, based on Ortho’s prompt and effective remedial action. Todd petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded for reconsideration given the Court’s holdings in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998), and Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Loken, J.)

Concurrence (Arnold, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership