Troupe v. May Department Stores Co.

20 F.3d 734 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Troupe v. May Department Stores Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
20 F.3d 734 (1994)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

Kimberly Hern Troupe (plaintiff) was a full-time saleswoman at the Lord & Taylor department store (the store) (defendant) in Chicago, Illinois. In December 1990, Troupe became pregnant and began to experience unusually severe morning sickness. Troupe requested, and the store granted, a part-time schedule from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Troupe continued to experience morning sickness at work, which caused her to be late on numerous occasions. On February 18, Troupe received a warning because she was late or left early on nine days in three weeks. Troupe was late again on February 19 and received a written warning. On March 29, after Troupe was late three days in a row, the store put her on a 60-day probationary period. During this time, Troupe was late 11 more times. On June 7, the store fired Troupe, who did not have an employment contract, although her maternity leave was scheduled to begin June 8. Before Troupe was fired, Rauch told Troupe that Troupe would be fired because Rauch did not think that Troupe would return to work after childbirth. The store had a policy of paying employees on maternity leave half pay, but Troupe did not receive any benefits after she was fired besides unemployment benefits. Troupe sued the store, alleging violations of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court granted the store’s motion for summary judgment. Troupe appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership