Twining v. New Jersey
United States Supreme Court
211 U.S. 78 (1908)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Twining and Cornell (defendants) were charged with fraud in a state court in New Jersey (plaintiff). A New Jersey law allowed the jury to be instructed that it could draw an unfavorable inference against a defendant from his failure to testify, where it was within his power, in denial of the evidence which tended to incriminate him. Twining and Cornell were convicted and appealed. They challenged the law as an unconstitutional violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
Dissent (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.