United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County v. Mayor & Council of the City of Camden
United States Supreme Court
465 U.S. 208, 104 S. Ct. 1020, 79 L. Ed. 2d 249 (1984)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
A municipal ordinance of the city of Camden, New Jersey, required that at least 40 percent of the employees of contractors and subcontractors working on city construction projects be Camden residents. United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County (plaintiff) brought suit against the mayor and council of the City of Camden (defendants), challenging the ordinance on the grounds that it violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Constitution. The New Jersey Supreme Court held that the Dormant Commerce Clause did not apply to invalidate the ordinance because the city of Camden was acting as a market participant. The Privileges and Immunities Clause did not apply because the discrimination was based on municipal, not state, residency. United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 798,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.