California Court of Appeals
92 Cal. Rptr. 786 (1971)
The city planning commission denied the petitioners’ application for a permit to construct an automobile service station in the Highway Service District. Although the proposed use complied with the subject property’s zoning designation, the city denied the application because there were already enough service stations more logically located at major intersections. In addition, approval would set a precedent that would make it harder to deny other such applications, and approval would establish an unneeded service station too close to a residential area. The stated purpose of the zoning ordinance was to “strengthen and promote development through stability and balance.” The property owner challenged the city’s decision in court, which affirmed the decision of the city’s planning commission. The property owner appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Molinari, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.