Vance v. W.A. Vandercook Co.
United States Supreme Court
170 U.S. 468, 18 S. Ct. 645, 42 L. Ed. 1111 (1898)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
W. A. Vandercook Co. (Vandercook) (plaintiff), a California corporation, shipped 68 packages of wine from California to South Carolina. The wine was seized in South Carolina and came to be possessed by S. W. Vance (defendant), a citizen of South Carolina. Vandercook filed a lawsuit against Vance to recover the wine, which was worth $1,000, and sought special damages of $10,000. Because Vandercook alleged damages in excess of $2,000, which was the amount-in-controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction, Vandercook filed the lawsuit in federal circuit court. Under South Carolina state law, special damages were only recoverable by a plaintiff seeking to recover property if the plaintiff received some direct injury. Vance moved to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that Vandercook could not recover the special damages it alleged under South Carolina law and that, without those damages, Vandercook’s complaint did not meet the amount-in-controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction. The circuit court found in favor of Vandercook. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.