Vandygriff v. First Savings & Loan Association

617 S.W.2d 669 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vandygriff v. First Savings & Loan Association

Texas Supreme Court
617 S.W.2d 669 (1981)

  • Written by Nicole Gray , JD

Facts

In March 1979, a group of organizers (plaintiffs) were granted a charter for Citizens Security Savings and Loan Association (Citizens) in Borger, Texas, by order of the Savings and Loan Commissioner of Texas, L. Alvis Vandygriff (plaintiff). The commissioner granted the charter after issuing a final denial of an earlier application for the charter, which was filed by a group of organizers consisting of many of the same community members who received the grant. The grant followed a meeting that took place during the month between the first application’s denial and the second application’s filing, wherein the commissioner was visited by five of the organizers who wanted to learn how to correct their application and to present a different view of the economic conditions related to the charter. First Savings and Loan Association of Borger, Texas (First Savings & Loan) (defendant) challenged the charter in state district court, having been an interested party to the initial application but not present for the meeting between the commissioner and the organizers. In the hearing of the second application, the commissioner admitted to the meeting and declared that his decision was based only upon the administrative record. The record for the first application was not admitted because there were new organizing members, a new application fee paid, new notices issued, new funds deposited, and a new location presented. However, the court of civil appeals concluded that the meeting was an unlawful ex parte communication, after finding that the second application was a continuation of the first; reversed the district-court judgment; and set aside the commissioner’s order. Vandygriff appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Denton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership