Vasquez v. Hillery
United States Supreme Court
474 U.S. 254, 106 S.Ct. 617, 88 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986)
Hillery (defendant) was an African-American indicted on murder charges by a grand jury. Hillery asserted that African-Americans had been intentionally excluded from the grand jury and moved to quash the indictment. The trial court denied his motion and Hillery was subsequently convicted. Hillary spent 16 years appealing his conviction in the state courts. When Hillery exhausted his state court appeals, he petitioned the federal district court for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court granted the writ. Vasquez (plaintiff), the warden of San Quentin Prison, petitioned the Supreme Court for review of the district court’s decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
Dissent (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 709,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.