Veit v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
8 T.C.M. 919 (1949)
Howard Veit (plaintiff) was the executive vice president of a cotton-goods company during 1939 and 1940. The company paid Veit a fixed salary, plus a bonus of 10 percent of the company’s profits for each respective year. The company was originally obligated to pay the bonus in 1941. In November 1940, Veit and the company agreed to defer the bonus payment until 1942. In December 1941, at the company’s request, the parties renegotiated the terms to defer the payment of the 1940 bonus over the years of 1942 through 1946. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) believed that Veit had constructively received the entirety of the 1940 bonus in 1942. As a result, the commissioner determined deficiencies in Veit’s taxes. Veit petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.