District Court of Appeal of Florida
561 So.2d 347 (1990)
On April 23, 1988, Velazquez (defendant) and an acquaintance, Alvarez, agreed to race against each other in a drag race. They set the start line at the beginning of the road, near a guardrail overlooking a canal, and set the finish line a quarter-mile away from the canal. Velazquez and Alvarez completed the agreed-upon course. Alvarez then turned his car around and began racing towards the start line. Velazquez followed closely behind. Both were unable to apply their brakes in time to avoid crashing through the guardrail. Alvarez’s car went over the canal and he died instantly. Velazquez landed in the water and escaped to safety. At trial, the defendant was convicted of vehicular homicide.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hubbart, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.