Velez v. Smith
Court of Appeal of California
142 Cal. App. 4th 1154 (2006)
- Written by Jacqueline (Hagan) Doyer, JD
Facts
Lena Velez (plaintiff) and Krista Smith (defendant) were in a domestic-partnership relationship. The couple began their relationship in 1989. In 1994 and 1996, Velez and Smith filed declarations of domestic partnership with local authorities in their city and county. Velez and Smith publicly represented that they were in a domestic partnership. Velez and Smith purchased both real and personal property together and maintained joint bank accounts during the domestic partnership. Velez received health insurance through Smith’s employer, and Smith listed Velez as a dependent on Smith’s tax returns. Neither Velez nor Smith ever filed a declaration of domestic partnership with the state of California. In 2004, Velez filed a petition to dissolve the domestic partnership. In 2005, Velez amended the petition requesting, among other things, a division of property acquired during the partnership. Smith filed a motion to strike the amended petition, because the court did not have jurisdiction. The trial court granted Smith’s motion, and Velez appealed the trial court’s ruling.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Swager, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
