Vidal v. Elster
United States Supreme Court
144 S. Ct. 1507, 602 U.S. 286 (2024)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Steve Elster (plaintiff) filed an application to register a trademark of “Trump too small.” The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) (defendant) denied the application on the ground that under trademark law, trademarks could not identify a living individual by name without the individual’s consent (the names clause). Elster appealed the PTO decision in federal court, arguing that the denial violated his First Amendment rights to free speech. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed with Elster. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (Sotomayor, J.)
Concurrence (Barrett, J.)
Concurrence (Kavanaugh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.