Viegas v. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
705 F.3d 1374 (2013)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
John Viegas (plaintiff) was a veteran who had been injured in a post-service diving accident and as a result was an incomplete quadriplegic. Viegas was at a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (defendant) medical facility to receive prescribed aquatic therapy. After his therapy, a grab bar he was using in the facility’s bathroom came loose from the wall, causing Viegas to fall from his wheelchair to the floor. He suffered multiple injuries, and his mobility was significantly reduced by the accident. Viegas filed a claim with the VA, seeking benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151. The VA denied his claim, and Viegas appealed to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board). The board upheld the VA’s denial, holding that § 1151 compensation was only available for injuries that were incurred through the VA’s fault during direct medical care. Viegas appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (the veterans court). The veterans court upheld the board’s decision, and Viegas appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mayer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.