Village of Barrington Hills v. Village of Hoffman Estates
Illinois Supreme Court
410 N.E.2d 37 (1980)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Village of Hoffman Estates (defendant) annexed an unincorporated area of land that was adjacent to the Village of Barrington Hills (plaintiff). The land had been zoned as residential. After the annexation, Hoffman Estates rezoned the land to allow for an open-air music theater, including 6,000 seats and a parking lot for 6,000 cars. Barrington Hills sued Hoffman Estates, challenging the rezoning. Barrington Hills claimed that the theater would harm it by requiring the hiring of additional police force and because of increased traffic, air pollution, litter, and noise pollution. Many of these effects would also harm Barrington Hills by decreasing the property values around the theater and thus decreasing tax revenues. Hoffman Estates filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The circuit court granted the motion, ruling that Barrington Hills did not have standing to bring the suit. The appellate court affirmed. Barrington Hills appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Underwood, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.