Villaneuva v. O'Gara

668 N.E.2d 589 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Villaneuva v. O'Gara

Illinois Appellate Court
668 N.E.2d 589 (1996)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

Dolia Villaneuva (plaintiff) and Sean O’Gara (defendant) were the parents of Amanda. Villaneuva and O’Gara were never married. In a paternity action, O’Gara was ordered to make weekly payments to Villaneuva for child support. O’Gara was later injured at work and received $251,665 from the settlement of his potential personal-injury claims. Subsequently, Villaneuva filed a petition in trial court for increased child support, seeking a one-time lump-sum payment of 20 percent of O’Gara’s settlement. The trial court determined that O’Gara’s entire settlement constituted income under the guidelines for child support and ordered that 20 percent of the settlement be deposited in trust for the benefit of Amanda. The trial court did not enter findings of fact regarding an apportionment of damages among all of the components of damages recoverable in personal-injury torts. O’Gara appealed. The parties agreed that the settlement amount included a component representing O’Gara’s lost earnings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McLaren, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership