Vincenzi v. Cerro
Connecticut Supreme Court
442 A.2d 1352 (1982)
Vincenzi (plaintiff) entered into a contract with Cerro (defendant) to build a house for Cerro. The contract price of $91,000 was to be paid in five installments over the course of the work. Cerro paid the first four installments, but refused to pay the remainder on the ground that the house was not complete. Vincenzi brought suit against Cerro for the remaining amount, and Cerro counterclaimed for the cost of the incomplete or defective work. The trial court found that the work was substantially complete and that Vincenzi had substantially performed on the contract, despite minor incomplete items. The court entered judgment in favor of Vincenzi for the remaining amount under the contract, less $5,000 for incomplete or defective work. Cerro appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Shea, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.