Vinikoor v. Pedal Pennsylvania, Inc.

974 A.2d 1233 (2009)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vinikoor v. Pedal Pennsylvania, Inc.

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
974 A.2d 1233 (2009)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD

Facts

Paul Vinikoor (plaintiff) was an experienced biker who had gone on many bike tours. He participated in a bicycle tour led by Pedal Pennsylvania, Inc. (Pedal) (defendant). During the tour, Vinikoor’s front tire got trapped in a groove on the road, causing him to fall off his bike. Vinikoor dislocated his pelvis. He sued Pedal and the Department of Transportation, seeking damages for his injuries. Vinikoor alleged that Pedal had negligently failed to inspect the route of the tour and misrepresented the route to Vinikoor as safe. Pedal moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted Pedal’s motion. Vinikoor appealed. On appeal, Vinikoor argued that because Pennsylvania had adopted comparative negligence, the doctrine of assumption of risk cannot bar him from recovery.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flaherty, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership