From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Virgil v. “Kash N’ Karry” Service Corp.
Maryland Court of Special Appeals
484 A.2d 652 (1984)
Facts
Irma Virgil (plaintiff) bought a thermos manufactured by Aladdin Industries, Incorporated (Aladdin), and sold by “Kash N’ Karry” Service Corporation (Kash) (defendants). The label said the thermos was easy to clean but lacked cleaning instructions, stated it contained glass, and recommended against use by children. Virgil regularly filled the thermos with coffee and milk and never dropped or misused it. Three months after purchase, Virgil poured hot coffee into the thermos and was pouring milk into it when the thermos imploded. Virgil’s eye was injured by the hot coffee and glass. Virgil sued Aladdin and Kash, alleging negligent failure to warn of the thermos’s dangerousness, breach of express warranty and implied warranty of merchantability, and strict liability. The trial court granted a directed verdict to Aladdin and Kash, concluding Virgil had not shown the thermos was defective when purchased. Virgil appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bloom, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.