Vlaming v. West Point School Board

895 S.E.2d 705 (2023)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vlaming v. West Point School Board

Virginia Supreme Court
895 S.E.2d 705 (2023)

Facts

Peter Vlaming (plaintiff) taught French at a public high school in Virginia. One of Vlaming’s students was a transgender male whose preferred name was Doe. Vlaming, claiming that it would violate his religious beliefs to refer to the student using masculine pronouns, refused to refer to the student using any pronouns. Instead, Vlaming always referred to the student using the name Doe. Vlaming was terminated. Vlaming sued the school board (defendant), alleging that he had been terminated because he refused to refer to the student using masculine pronouns and that this termination violated his right to freely exercise his religious beliefs under both the Virginia Constitution and the Virginia Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failing to state a legally viable claim. Vlaming appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kelsey, J.)

Concurrence (Mann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 922,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 922,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 922,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,300+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,000 law school casebooks.

Case book preview