Vogel v. W.T. Grant Co.

327 A.2d 133 (1974)

From our private database of 47,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vogel v. W.T. Grant Co.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
327 A.2d 133 (1974)

  • Written by Eric Miller, JD

Facts

W.T. Grant Company (Grant) (defendant) sought to obtain credit payments from two customers, Vogel (plaintiff) and Smith (plaintiff). In the course of these efforts, Grant contacted Vogel’s and Smith’s employers and family members, with whom Grant discussed Vogel’s and Smith’s debts. Vogel and Smith brought suit for invasion of privacy. The chancellor found in favor of Vogel and Smith. Grant was enjoined from further contact with third parties in Grant’s attempts to collect from Vogel and Smith. Grant appealed. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)

Concurrence (Manderino, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 964,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,500 briefs - keyed to 1,006 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms

  • Prior RestraintAction by the government to prevent speech before it takes place.
  • Invasion of PrivacyThe wrongful intrusion into one’s personal life, solitude, or seclusion which may give rise to an action in tort and where damages are recoverable.

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

Case book preview
Start your free 7-day trial