Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
212 So.2d 906 (1968)
- Written by Christine Hilgeman, JD
Facts
Audrey E. Vokes (Vokes) (plaintiff) was induced by an attractive promotional offer and by compliments about her dancing made by J.P. Davenport (Davenport), owner of an Arthur Murray franchise (Arthur Murray) (defendants), to enter into an initial contract for one month's worth of dance lessons for $14.50. Over the next sixteen months, Vokes was sold fourteen additional dance courses at Arthur Murray totaling $31,090.45. Vokes commenced an action against the defendants alleging that they had fraudulently induced her to purchase additional hours of dance lessons through a scheme of false representations as to her prowess and rapid progress as a dancer. The defendants contended that their statements to Vokes were merely opinions or "puffing" permitted by the trade and were not misrepresentations of fact. The trial court dismissed the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. Vokes appealed that decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pierce, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.