Volland-Golden v. City of Chicago
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
89 F. Supp. 3d 983 (2015)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
[Editor’s Note: This case is listed as Volland-Goland v. City of Chicago in Sklansky, Evidence: Cases, Commentary, and Problems, 5th Ed.] John Volland (plaintiff) was arrested by Chicago police officers after a traffic stop. According to Volland, the stop lacked justification, and the officers used unnecessary force. The officers claimed the stop was justified, Volland forcibly resisted arrest, and pepper spray and a takedown were necessary. Illinois charged Volland with battery and resisting arrest. At the criminal trial, Volland testified in his defense and was ultimately acquitted. Volland then filed a civil action against the police officers and the City of Chicago (defendants), alleging violations of his constitutional rights. Volland died before trial. His sister and executor, Madonna Volland-Golden (plaintiff), continued the litigation. Volland-Golden filed a motion, seeking to have Volland’s testimony from the criminal trial admitted into evidence in the civil trial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shadur, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.