Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.
United States Supreme Court
446 U.S. 740 (1980)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Walker (plaintiff) filed a products-liability suit against Armco Steel Corp. (Armco) (defendant) in Oklahoma federal district court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. The complaint was filed before the Oklahoma statute of limitations had run on the claim, but service of process was not actually made until after the statute of limitations had run. An Oklahoma state law did not deem an action to commence for purposes of the statute of limitations until process was served on the defendant. Based on the running of the statute of limitations without commencement of an action, therefore, Armco filed a motion to dismiss. Walker admitted that his claim would be dismissed under the state law but argued that Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governed when an action was commenced and thus preempted the Oklahoma state law. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
