Walker v. Holt
Louisiana Court of Appeal
888 So. 2d 255 (2004)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Graham Smith, Sr. (defendant) owned an undivided one-half interest in a property and was the usufructuary of the other one-half interest. Four of Smith’s children, Kathy Holt, Elizabeth Distefano, Anita Campo, and Graham Smith, Jr. (defendants), were the naked owners of an undivided one-twelfth interest in the property. Holt lived in the property with her husband. Frederick Walker (plaintiff) was injured on the property when he stepped in a hole while delivering gas for his employer. Walker sued the Holts, Smith, Sr., and the nonresident siblings. Walker’s employer’s workers’-compensation insurer also filed suit against the same parties to recover amounts it had paid out for Walker’s injury, and that suit was consolidated with Walker’s. After various proceedings at the trial-court level, the court eventually granted the nonresident siblings’ motion for summary judgment, holding that the nonresident siblings, as naked owners, did not have a duty to inspect or maintain the property. Walker and the insurance agency appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
