Walker v. Secretary of Treasury, IRS

713 F. Supp. 403 (1989)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Walker v. Secretary of Treasury, IRS

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
713 F. Supp. 403 (1989)

Facts

Tracy Walker (plaintiff), a light-skinned Black woman, worked as a typist in the Atlanta office of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant). Walker had a strained relationship with her supervisor, Ruby Lewis, who was a dark-skinned Black woman. Walker believed that Lewis subjected her to increased scrutiny and reprimanded her for false or insubstantial infractions due to personal hostility toward Walker’s lighter skin. Walker met with the equal-employment-opportunity-program manager for the IRS’s Atlanta district to discuss Lewis’s conduct. Two weeks later, Walker was terminated based on a recommendation from Lewis citing tardiness, laziness, incompetence, and attitude problems. Walker sued the IRS for, among other things, violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), arguing that she was terminated because of Lewis’s color-based discrimination and that her termination constituted retaliation for reporting Lewis’s discriminatory conduct. The IRS argued that color-based discrimination was synonymous with race-based discrimination and that Walker’s discrimination claim therefore failed because both Walker and Lewis were Black. The district judge referred the case to a magistrate, who recommended, among other things, granting summary judgment to the IRS regarding the Title VII discrimination claim but denying summary judgment as to the retaliation claim. The district court reviewed the magistrate’s recommendation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moye, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 916,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership