Supreme Court of Montana
330 P.2d 971
Mattuschek (defendant) owned a ranch and contracted with E. F. Carnell to act as his agent for selling the ranch. Mattuschek executed a written instrument assigning Carnell the exclusive right to sell the property. Carnell found a willing purchaser in Ward (plaintiff). Ward issued a down payment check to Carnell and executed a written instrument stating that he agreed to purchase the ranch in accordance with the terms of the agreement between Carnell and Mattuschek. Mattuschek refused to sell the property to Ward. Ward filed suit seeking specific performance and damages. The trial court ruled in favor of Mattuschek on the grounds that Ward could not produce a written instrument signed by Mattuschek that satisfied the statute of frauds. Ward appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fall, J.)
Dissent (Adair, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.