Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Brodel

31 Cal. 2d 766, 192 P.2d 949 (1948)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Brodel

California Supreme Court
31 Cal. 2d 766, 192 P.2d 949 (1948)

SH

Facts

In March 1942, Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. (Warner) (plaintiff) entered into a written contract with Brodel (defendant), then a minor, wherein Brodel promised to perform certain dramatic services for Warner on an exclusive basis during the term of the contract. The term commenced on March 30, 1942, and continued thereafter for 52 weeks. The contract granted Warner six separate options to extend the term for additional successive periods of 52 weeks each. Pursuant to Section 36 of the Civil Code, Warner obtained approval of the contract from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Brodel performed her obligations under the contract for the first 52 weeks, and, when Warner elected to exercise the first three options, she continued to perform for three additional periods of 52 weeks each. In February 1946, one month after Brodel reached majority, Warner notified Brodel of its election to exercise the fourth option. Brodel replied that she disaffirmed the contract and would render no further services to Warner. Warner filed suit, seeking declaratory relief and an injunction to prevent Brodel from performing dramatic services for anyone other than Warner for the duration of the term.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Traynor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership