Warren v. Detlefsen

281 Ark. 196 (1984)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Warren v. Detlefsen

Arkansas Supreme Court
281 Ark. 196 (1984)

Facts

H. N. and Vera Warren (defendants) developed and built the Warren Subdivision. The Warren Subdivision had three adjoining residential neighborhoods known as units. In Unit One, seven of the nine deeds were restricted to residential use. In Unit Two, 13 of the 21 deeds were restricted to residential use. In Unit Three, 12 of the 20 deeds contained similar restrictions. Further, the Warrens had orally informed prospective buyers that only single-family homes would be constructed and that no apartments would be constructed. Buyers relied on these statements in deciding to purchase from the Warrens. Indeed, when buyers made their purchases, there were only single-family homes in the Warren Subdivision. But the Warrens later sought to construct two duplexes on lots in Unit 3. Mike Detlefsen and other homeowners in the Warren Subdivision (plaintiffs) filed suit to enjoin the construction of the duplexes. The trial court enjoined the Warrens from building the duplexes, finding that the lots were restricted to single-family homes. The Warrens appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hickman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership