Washington Post Co. v. Special Inspector for Afghanistan Reconstruction

2021 WL 4502106 (2021)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Washington Post Co. v. Special Inspector for Afghanistan Reconstruction

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
2021 WL 4502106 (2021)

Facts

The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) (defendant) was the federal agency responsible for overseeing the United States reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan. As part of its Lessons Learned program, SIGAR conducted interviews with individuals who had knowledge of the United States reconstruction program. The records of interviews (ROIs) were sources of information used in the Lessons Learned reports and were also used to help inform the recommendations made by SIGAR in its reports. Craig Whitlock, a reporter from the Washington Post Company (Washington Post) (plaintiff), submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to SIGAR, seeking to obtain all ROIs from Lessons Learned. SIGAR produced only some of the requested records, contending that portions of 11 ROIs were exempt from disclosure under Exemption 5 of FOIA. Exemption 5 allowed for withholding if a document belonged to a government agency and if it fell within the scope of the deliberative-process privilege. Washington Post and SIGAR filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The district court took the motions under advisement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership