Washington v. Texas
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 14 (1967)
- Written by Richard Lavigne, JD
Facts
Washington (defendant) was convicted of murder after a jury trial. A coparticipant in the crime had already been convicted of the same murder prior to the time of Washington’s trial. Laws of the state of Texas (plaintiff) prohibited persons charged or convicted as coparticipants in the same crime from testifying on behalf of one another. If not prohibited by state law, the codefendant would have testified that he committed the murder and that Washington tried to prevent him from committing the murder. The state courts upheld Washington’s conviction on appeal. Washington petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Warren, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.