Watson v. Philip Morris
United States Supreme Court
551 U.S. 142 (2007)
- Written by Jack Newell, JD
Facts
Lisa Watson (plaintiff) sued Philip Morris (defendant), a cigarette company, for deceptive business practices in relation to its advertising. Philip Morris sought to remove the case to federal court on the ground that it was acting under a federal officer. Philip Morris’s reasoning was that its advertising was heavily regulated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and therefore fell within the scope of action under a federal officer. Moreover, the FTC had delegated the testing of the cigarettes to Philip Morris. According to Philip Morris, this meant that the FTC had delegated its legal authority also. The district court granted the removal, and the circuit court upheld it. Watson appealed to the Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.