United States Supreme Court
470 U.S. 598 (1985)
Wayte (defendant) was a vocal war opponent who refused to register for the Selective Service System. Wayte wrote a letter to the Selective Service System and the President reporting that he would not register for the draft. Wayte was warned that he could be prosecuted, but refused to register. Wayte was indicted. Wayte then moved to dismiss on the grounds that he was selectively prosecuted for exercising his constitutional right to freedom of speech and sought discovery of government documents. The district court ordered discovery, but the government did not provide the documents. The district court dismissed the charges. The court of appeals reversed, holding that Wayte had not proven selective prosecution and that the discovery order was erroneous. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.