Weeks v. Baker & McKenzie

74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 510 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Weeks v. Baker & McKenzie

California Court of Appeal
74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 510 (1998)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

Rena Weeks (plaintiff) sued Martin R. Greenstein for sexual harassment while Weeks was Greenstein’s secretary at Baker & McKenzie (defendant). A jury found Greenstein guilty and awarded Weeks $50,000 in compensatory damages from Greenstein and Baker & McKenzie, $225,000 in punitive damages from Greenstein, $6.9 million in punitive damages from Baker & McKenzie, and $1,847,437.86 in attorney’s fees and expenses. The $6.9 million figure was reduced to $3.9 million by the trial court. The attorney’s fees were calculated by fixing the lodestar, or the reasonable hourly fee multiplied by the number of hours reasonably devoted by each legal representative to the case. Relying on the contingent nature of the award, the difficulty of the litigation, the skills displayed in conducting the litigation, the amounts involved and results obtained, the fact that Weeks’s attorneys rejected other cases to represent Weeks, and the delay in receiving payment, the trial court enhanced the lodestar amount by multiplying it by 1.7. Baker & McKenzie appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership