Weltzin v. Nail

618 N.W.2d 293 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Weltzin v. Nail

Iowa Supreme Court
618 N.W.2d 293 (2000)

JL

Facts

Roger Weltzin and other shareholders (plaintiffs) of LaPorte City Cooperative Elevators (LaPorte) brought a derivative action against former LaPorte manager Michael Nail and other LaPorte directors and officers (defendants), alleging that Nail had committed a negligent breach of his fiduciary duty and made fraudulent misrepresentations. The plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive damages and filed a demand for a jury trial. The defendants moved to strike the jury demand, arguing that a shareholder derivative lawsuit was equitable in nature and that there was therefore no right to a jury trial. The plaintiffs argued that while the overall nature of the derivative suit was equitable, the plaintiffs also had legal claims of breach of contract and negligence and sought the legal remedy of monetary damages. The plaintiffs further pointed out that defendants had asserted legal affirmative defenses. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion, and the plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Snell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership