Wena Hotels, Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt

41 I.L.M. 881 (2002)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wena Hotels, Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
41 I.L.M. 881 (2002)

Facts

Wena Hotels Limited (Wena) (plaintiff) entered into lease agreements with the Arab Republic of Egypt (Egypt) (defendant) to operate and upgrade the Luxor Hotel and the El Nile Hotel. A series of disputes arose when Wena withheld rent, because it felt the condition of the hotels was not as described in the leases. Eventually, Wena was evicted, and a court receiver was appointed over the hotels. Wena filed a request for arbitration before an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) tribunal. Egypt objected to ICSID’s jurisdiction on the grounds that Wena, an English incorporated company, was owned by an Egyptian national, and therefore Wena should be treated as being an Egyptian company under the ICSID Convention.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership