West v. Nabors Drilling USA, Inc.

330 F.3d 379 (2003)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

West v. Nabors Drilling USA, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
330 F.3d 379 (2003)

Facts

Thomas West (plaintiff) worked for Nabors Drilling USA, Inc. (Nabors) (defendant) as a drilling rig supervisor. When West was 60 years old, Nabors terminated him and replaced him with a 38-year-old employee. West’s salary was $63,596.47. During the December 10, 1998, discharge conversation, West’s supervisor told him to reach out because the supervisor might be able to rehire him. Over the next couple of months, West contacted the supervisor three or four times, delaying seeking employment elsewhere pending a rehire determination. However, by February 1999, West needed money to support his family. On February 15, he obtained a truck-driver job at a construction company. The nonsupervisory position paid only $7.00 an hour. When business declined, West obtained a truck-driver job at another company, earning between $7.50 and $10.25 an hour. After starting the original driver job on February 15, West did not make any efforts to seek employment in a role substantially equivalent to his former role at Nabors. In a suit against Nabors for willful age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), West sought backpay covering lost wages from his termination to the time of judgment. He also sought liquidated damages in an amount equal to awarded backpay, which was proper under the ADEA if an employer’s violation was willful. Nabors argued that backpay, and thus liquidated damages, were inappropriate because West failed to properly mitigate his damages. The district-court jury held in West’s favor on the willful-discrimination claim and awarded West $115,000 in backpay for December 1998 to judgment and another $115,000 in liquidated damages. Nabors appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fitzwater, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 916,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership