Western Steel and Ship Repair, Inc. v. RMI, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
176 Cal. App. 3d 1108, 222 Cal. Rptr. 556 (1986)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
RMI, Inc. (RMI) (defendant) hired Western Steel and Ship Repair, Inc. (Western) (plaintiff) as a subcontractor to work on overhauling vessels for the United States Navy. Western sued RMI, seeking liquidated contract damages. On the same day Western filed the lawsuit, Western moved for an ex parte attachment of RMI’s funds. Western supported this motion by alleging that RMI was in a shaky financial condition and had refused to pay the underlying claim. The trial court granted the motion and issued a writ of attachment. Western levied the writ on an RMI bank account the following day. RMI moved to quash the writ of attachment. The court set a hearing for the next day. RMI argued that Western had failed to establish the probable validity of its claim and had failed to justify the ex parte issuance of the writ with sufficient proof of great or irreparable injury. The trial court denied the motion to quash. RMI appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kremer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.